User Tools

Site Tools


faq

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
faq [2012/04/16 16:40]
paddy [Programming Language Semantics]
faq [2012/04/16 22:38]
95.89.150.111 [PURE vs. HOL]
Line 202: Line 202:
 :!: There are several levels to this question: :!: There are several levels to this question:
  
-  - First, the latter is by itself a HOL formula, while the former contains HOL formulas, but is more considered a rule.+  - First, the latter is by itself a HOL formula, while the former contains HOL formulas, but is more considered a rule.
   - The former says that $G$ can be proven //​syntactically//​ from the given assumptions $A_1, A_2, A_3$. The latter says that you can prove using no assumptions that whenever all $A_1, A_2, A_3$ hold, $G$ holds, too.   - The former says that $G$ can be proven //​syntactically//​ from the given assumptions $A_1, A_2, A_3$. The latter says that you can prove using no assumptions that whenever all $A_1, A_2, A_3$ hold, $G$ holds, too.
   - Maybe the main practical difference: the former is nicely applicable as a rule, where the latter is nearly useless.   - Maybe the main practical difference: the former is nicely applicable as a rule, where the latter is nearly useless.
faq.txt ยท Last modified: 2013/03/01 10:12 by 124.207.188.66