drule
is a proof method. It applies a rule if possible.
Assume we have a subgoal
and we want to use drule
with rule
Then, drule
does the following:
Note that drule
is almost the same as frule
. The only difference is that frule
keeps the assumption “used” by the used rule while drule
drops it. This is useful if is needed to prove the new subgoals; drule
is unsafe because of this.
Assume we have the goal
Applying apply (drule mp)
yields new goals
which can both be solved by Assumption
. Note that apply (drule(2) mp)
is a shortcut for this and immediately solves the goal.
With drule_tac
, you can force schematic variables in the used rule to take specific values. The extended syntax is:
apply (drule_tac ident1="expr1" and ident2="expr1" and ... in rule)
This means that the variables ?ident1
is replaced by expression expr1
and similarly for the others. Note that you have to leave out the question mark marking schematic variables. Find out which variables a rule uses with thm rule
.
Oftentimes, a rule application results in several subgoals that can directly be solved by Assumption
; see above for an example. Instead of applying assumption
by hand, you can apply drule(k)
which forces Isabelle to apply assumption
times after the rule application.